Legal Opinion
Glow Industries, Inc. v. Lopez
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 23, 2003No. CV 02-06167 MMM PJWPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MORROW, District Judge.
Plaintiff Glow Industries, Inc. (“Glow”) filed this action on August 7, 2002, alleging that the use by defendants Jennifer Lopez and Coty, Inc. of the mark Glow by J.Lo in marketing perfume and other beauty products constituted trademark infringement and unfair competition. Glow Industries alleges that it has marketed and sold beauty products under the mark Glow since 1999, and that it has filed an application to secure federal registration of the mark. Defendants answered the complaint on October 8, 2002;…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Conversive, Inc. v. Conversagent, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
- InterState Net Bank v. NetB@ Nk, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Resource Lenders, Inc. v. SOURCE SOLUTIONS, INC.District Court, E.D. California · 2005
- BBC Group NV LLC v. Island Life Restaurant Group LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Boost Beauty, LLC v. Woo Signatures, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.