Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fragomeno v. Insurance Co. of the West

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1989No. B033011Published

1DissentJohnson, J.

I respectfully dissent. The dispositive issue in this case is whether damages recoverable in an unlawful detainer action sound in tort or contract. If they sound in tort, as an unbroken line of cases spanning 70 years so holds, Insurance Company of the West (ICW) is obligated to defend the Fragomenos in the unlawful detainer action brought by their landlord.

Prior to discussing the case authority on this issue, I first briefly address certain preliminary issues.

*832I. The Term “Personal Injury” Includes Any Injury Arising From the Tortious Acts Enumerated in the Endorsement.

Since coverage is…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Crane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Peterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API