Legal Opinion

Vroman v. Upp

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The plaintiff, C. D. Vroman, appeals from a judgment rendered on a verdict in favor of the defendant, Louis J. Upp. According to the undisputed facts, a collision occurred at the intersection of North Central avenue and Fourth street in the city of Medford, between an automobile driven by Judd Doty and one driven by the defendant. Doty was proceeding in a northerly direction on North Central avenue and after entering the said intersection his car was struck, at or near the left rear wheel, by the car of the defendant, who was proceeding in an easterly direction. The impact threw the Doty car…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Logan v. SchjeldahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Cincinnati St. Ry. Co. v. WatermanOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Stryker v. HastieOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Roellig v. GearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Wallace v. PafkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. EdmondsOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Dorey v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Ernst v. BroughtonOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Nusom Et Ux v. Fromm Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Wheeler v. NickelsOregon Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API