Nusom Et Ux v. Fromm Et Ux
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCbawfobd, J.
(Pro Tempore).
Plaintiffs sued at law to recover $7,000 paid to J. D. and Margaret Turnidge for the use and benefit of defendants. Defendants denied generally and plead estoppel arising from res judicata. Plaintiffs recovered judgment for $5,000. Judgment notwithstanding the verdict was entered in favor of defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.
In the one assignment of error three propositions are presented:
1. The timeliness of the order granting judgment notwithstanding the verdict and the right of the court to consider testimony that had been excluded in disposing of such motion.
2. Res judicata.
3.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- White v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Wagner v. Savage, as Adm'rOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Kelley Et Ux. v. Mallory Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- United States Nat. Bank v. ShehanOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Templeton v. HollinsheadOregon Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stone v. BENEFICIAL STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Slate Construction Co. v. Pacific General Contractors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Grant v. YokOregon Supreme Court · 1963