Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Bowlin

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided June 6, 2008No. Civil Action 07-3067-KHVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge.

James Earl Lindsey brings suit pro se against Scott Bowlin, M.D., for violation of constitutional rights under the Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs claims arise from his incarceration in Leavenworth Detention Center, a private prison run by the Corrections Corporation of America (“CCA”). 1 Specifically, plaintiff claims that during said incarceration, defendant, a physician for CCA, concealed and/or failed to take reasonable steps to prevent the spread of methicillin-resistant…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rural Water Dist. No. 4 v. City of Eudora, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 2009
  2. Flemming v. Core CivicDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
  3. Flemming v. Core CivicDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
  4. Morris v. RogersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
  5. Quinones v. CoreCivicDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API