Legal Opinion

Seal v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 28, 2016No. 51/15PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

Police access to communications over various networks plays a key role in many criminal investigations. A particularly important network is the telephone system. Surveillance of the telecommunications network, however, is heavily circumscribed by constitutional and statutory protections at both the state and federal level.1 In this case, we are asked to interpret Md.Code (1973, 2013 Repl.Vol., 2015 Supp.), § 10-402(c)(2) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article (“CJP”) — an exception to the Maryland Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act’s general prohibition on the interception of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. United States v. Harold Haimowitz, Dan Scarborough, George L. OnettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Michael D. Andreas and Terrance S. Wilson, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. State v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boston v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Borges v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  3. Cutchember v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  4. Cutchember v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2026
  5. Ingersoll v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API