Legal Opinion

Cutchember v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 2, 2026No. 39/25Published

1Opinion of the Court

Lance Cutchember v. State of Maryland, No. 39, September Term, 2025; Phillip Antoine Hicks v. State of Maryland, No. 40, September Term, 2025; Opinion by Killough, J. CRIMINAL LAW - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ARTICLE (“CP”) § 1-211 - RETROACTIVITY The Supreme Court of Maryland held that CP § 1-211(c) provides a remedy for a violation of CP § 1-211(a)-(b), and, given the General Assembly’s intent as evidenced by the plain language of the statute, no part of CP § 1-211 could have been violated before its effective date of July 1, 2023. Consequently, the exclusionary remedy in § 1-211(c) does not apply…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Blackstone v. SharmaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Langston v. RiffeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. Berry & State Farm v. QueenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  5. Spielman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API