Legal Opinion
Solomon v. Baar
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcGoldrick, J.
This is an action brought by permission of the Federal court by the trustee in bankruptcy for I. Shainin & Company, Incorporated, against the six defendants. The first three are attorneys, associated as partners in a law firm; the other two are also attorneys, but in the employ of the partnership. The action as to these two has been severed. The last named defendant, Jesse Shenson, has not been served and is not now before the court. It may be of interest to note, however, that he was a client of the law partnership, the activities of which, on his behalf, led to plaintiff’s alleged grievance.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dean v. . KochendorferNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Teel v. . YostNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Morris v. DouglassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Trier v. . HermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Shenson v. I. Shainin & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pisano v. County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- McClellan Agency, Inc. v. Cunningham, Nielsen & Molloy, Inc., New York County Courts1960
- Bornstein v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Solomon v. BaarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- People v. DentineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967