McClellan Agency, Inc. v. Cunningham, Nielsen & Molloy, Inc.
New York County Courts
1Opinion of the CourtJames D. Hopkins, J.
The plaintiff moves for summary judgment as against the defendant Cunningham, Nielsen & Molloy, Inc., in an action based on a promissory note executed and *373delivered by the defendant to the plaintiff in the sum of $5,242.06, payable on demand. In turn, the defendant has cross-moved for summary judgment upon the counterclaim contained in its answer.
It appears from the affidavits submitted on the motions that prior to the making and delivery of the note the defendant had contracted for the issuance of certain insurance policies from the plaintiff, and that the defendant was indebted to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hauser v. BartowNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Higgins v. . RidgwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Fischer v. . LangbeinNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Day v. . BachNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of CallisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wayne County Bank v. HodgesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- Hornstein v. WolfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- District Attorney v. FarringtonNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Lloyd v. SchubertNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Siegel v. Northern Boulevard & 80th Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968