Legal Opinion

Bornstein v. Levine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 27, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, following reargument, denying motion to dismiss the first and second causes of action in the complaint modified, on the law, to dismiss the second cause of action as insufficient, with leave to replead, and the order is otherwise affirmed, with costs to appellant. The first cause of action is sufficient because it depends upon processes, to wit, executions, issued without prior judicial approval, which were void, as eventually resolved by the courts (Levine v. Bornstein, 4 N Y 2d 241). The second cause of action, however, is insufficient. It depends upon the issuance of third-party…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fischer v. . LangbeinNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Day v. . BachNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Lyon v. YatesNew York Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Solomon v. BaarNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Solomon v. BaarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Silberstein v. Presbyterian HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Silberstein v. Presbyterian HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. 1090 Jericho Corp. v. EliasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Gaines v. GainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API