Dugan v. City of Portland
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtWebber, J.
Plaintiff appeals from dismissal of her complaint. She alleged that she tripped over spikes protruding from a railroad tie used as a retaining wall in a sidewalk maintained by the defendant municipal corporation. She alleges that this condition constituted a nuisance and seeks recovery under the nuisance statute. R. S., Ch. 141, Sec. 6.
R. S., Ch. 96, Sec. 89 provides a remedy for one situated as was this plaintiff. The statute provides in part:
“Whoever receives any bodily injury * * * through any defect or want of repair or sufficient railing in any highway, townway, causeway or bridge may…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whalen v. Worcester Electric Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Huntington v. City of CalaisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
- Morneault v. Inhabitants of Town of HampdenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
- Verreault v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Lindemeyer v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Begin v. BernardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964
- Brewer v. Inhabitants of CumberlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Stickney v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Begin v. BernardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964