Stickney v. City of Portland
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTS, Justice.
Plaintiff Mark Stickney appeals from the dismissal of his complaint against defendant City of Portland by the Superior Court (Cumberland County, McKinley, A.R.J.) pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). On appeal, Stickney contends that the failure to maintain or replace a stop sign is a highway defect within the meaning of the Highway Liability for Damages Act for which the City is responsible. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.
The material allegations are set forth in Stickney’s complaint, which for the purposes of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss must be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCarthy v. Inhabitants of LeedsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1917
- Dugan v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961
- Hodgdon v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rich v. DEPARTMENT OF MARINE RESOURCESSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010