Legal Opinion

Morneault v. Inhabitants of Town of Hampden

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 20, 1950PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliamson, J.

On motion for a new trial, the defendant town has the burden of establishing that the jury was plainly wrong in finding first, that the motor vehicle accident with resulting damage was caused by a defect in the highway, or second, that the plaintiff was free from contributory negligence. The ground in the motion that the damages were excessive was not argued by the defendant and is, therefore, considered to have been abandoned.

The testimony taken in the light most favorable to the plaintiff discloses the following facts.

About midnight on May 26, 1949 the plaintiff, a young man twenty years of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spang v. CoteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  2. Barnes v. Inhabitants of RumfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1902
  3. Holmes v. Inhabitants of ParisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1884
  4. Tibbetts v. Central Maine Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1946
  5. Whitman v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Packard v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  2. McMann v. Reliable Furniture Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  3. Bragdon v. ShapiroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  4. Rockhold v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Thorbjohnson v. Rockland-Rockport Lime Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API