Paschall v. Crisp

I concur with the majority’s conclusion that plaintiff failed adequately to serve defendant within the statutory *626period but write separately to address an argument under ORCP 7 D(4) that the majority does not address.

According to plaintiff, service in accordance with ORCP 7 D(4) is presumed to be adequate and in this case service was sufficiently completed to confer jurisdiction on the court within the applicable statutory period. Plaintiff argues that, under ORCP 7 D(4)(alfi),1 when follow-up mailings are required to multiple addresses, service is complete for jurisdictional purposes upon…