Legal Opinion

Paschall v. Crisp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 24, 1996No. 9211-07543; CA A85037Published

1Opinion of the Court

910 P.2d 407 (1996)

138 Or. App. 618

Michael R. PASCHALL, Appellant,

v.

Lynn Richard CRISP, Defendant, and

Kim Adam Crisp, Respondent.

9211-07543; CA A85037.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted September 18, 1995.

Decided January 24, 1996.

Kathryn H. Clarke, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs was Nick Chaivoe, Portland.

Thomas W. Brown, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Kathleen J. Tesner.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and LANDAU and LEESON, JJ.

LANDAU, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant on the ground that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Baker v. FoyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Duber v. ZeitlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Murphy v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API