Legal Opinion

Altfillisch v. McCarty

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1926No. File No. 5338PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff brought his action against defendants to recover on a certain promissory note. The note was made by defendant McCarty, payable to the order of defendant *204Smith, and was by Smith indorsed in blank before maturity, and so indorsed was delivered and transferred to De Smet National Bank, and thereafter plaintiff acquired the same, paying value, but after the maturity thereof. Judgment was rendered against the defendant maker, M'cCarty, by default. The defendant Smith answered that his taking of the note as payee and his indorsement thereon were entirely without consideration, and solely…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marling v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Rylee v. WilkersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  3. McKinney v. PetersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Federal Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Bartels v. SuterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Cornell v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  4. La Due v. BirdSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Tabor State Bank v. RollinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API