Legal Opinion
Smith v. Federal Surety Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 8, 1932No. File No. 6903PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
'MISER, C.
The fidelity bond on which the claim against the appellant suret)’’ company is based is in part as follows: “Whereas, Helmer Hegness * * * has been appointed to the position of president in the service of the Farmers’ Security State Bank, Centerville, South Dakota, * * * Federal Surety Company, * * * hereby covenants and agrees that it will * * * • reimburse the employer to the extent of the sum of $5,000.00 * * * for loss of money, securities, or other personal property belonging to or in possession of the employer or for which the employer may be responsible to others, which the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Guarantee Co. of North America v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- State v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Champion Ice Mfg. & Cold Storage Co. v. American Bonding & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United Pacific Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Interstate Auction, Inc. v. Central National Insurance, Group, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. United Pacific InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Strong v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Citizens Bank of Oregon v. American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.