Legal Opinion

Tabor State Bank v. Rollins

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1929No. File No. 6254PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurch, J.

Plaintiff sues to recover upon a promissory note signed by B. F. Rollins and C. M. Conger, payable to Security State Bank of Dante, S. D., for $5,000, dated October 1, 1920, due one year after date with interest. Plaintiff claims as indorsee of the note. The makers defend on the ground that the note was an accommodation note, was without consideration, and that it was *523not transferred ¡before maturity, for value, in due course. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment and an order denying a new trial.

Such portions of the evidence as are necessary will be alluded to in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. State ex rel. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Schmidt v. CarpenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Dal v. FischerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  4. McPherson v. JuliusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Altfillisch v. McCartySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Frana v. RollinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API