Legal Opinion

Over v. Dehne

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 1905No. 5,382PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Suit by Charles Dehne against Ewald Over. Erom a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, C. J.

-Appellee sued appellant to recover'damages resulting from fire alleged to have been communicated to his dwelling from appellant’s foundry, and to enjoin appellant from continuing to operate his foundry and *429cupola so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of his premises.

The complaint was in a single paragraph, to which an answer in six paragraphs was addressed. Eeply in denial. Upon the issues thus joined, trial was had by the court, resulting in a general finding and judgment for appellee.

Appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled. By his assignment of errors he questions the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Parkison v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Owen v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Xenia Real Estate Co. v. MacyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Sherlock v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Romona Oölitic Stone Co. v. Central States Bridge Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Beavers v. BessIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Marks v. BoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Cooley v. KelleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Wilson v. SentmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API