Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Sentman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1920No. 10,394PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Montgomery Circuit Court; I. E. Schoonover, Special Judge. Action between John M. Wilson and another and Edgar A. Sentman and another. From the judgment rendered, the former appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBatman, P. J.

1-2. The transcript in this appeal was filed in this court on August 13, 1918. On November 8, 1918, appellees filed their objections to the record, and motion to dismiss the appeal. In support of this motion appellees cite the fact that the record discloses that the only error assigned is based on the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial; that the motion for a new trial does not have any memorandum attached thereto, specifying the reason or reasons why such motion should be sustained, as required by §5 of the act of 1917 concerning civil procedure. Acts 1917 p.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Over v. DehneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Monfort v. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Mercantile Commercial Bank v. Southwestern Indiana Coal Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Ohio Farmers Insurance v. DobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Griffith v. HammerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Old Reliable Paint Co. v. StoreyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API