Legal Opinion
Peo. Ex Rel. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. v. . P.S. Comm.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 8, 1915PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The respondent, The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, made two increases in commutation rates charged by it to certain suburban points, one in 1907 and the second in 1910. Four proceedings were instituted by various parties to have it declared by the public service commission that these increased rates were not justified and were unreasonable and to have them reduced. The proceedings failed so far as pertained to the increase in rates adopted…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
3Cited by8 opinions
- Murphy v. . N.Y.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Murphy v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- In re Willie W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Town of Mamaroneck v. New York Interurban Water Co.New York Supreme Court · 1925
- Suffolk Sanitary Corp. v. Town BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.