Town of Mamaroneck v. New York Interurban Water Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
George H. Taylor, Jr., J.
This action is brought by the plaintiffs, municipalities and individuals therein resident, who are consumers of water, against the defendant, a corporation supplying them with that commodity, to procure a judgment (a) that certain rules and regulations and an increased schedule of water rates and charges effective March 1, 1924, and by the defendant promulgated prior thereto, are unreasonable, unlawful and oppressive, and (b) permanently enjoining the defendant from collecting or attempting to collect those rates for water, from plaintiffs and all others similarly…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Cotting v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. ElkinMount Vernon City Court · 1948
- Scranton-Spring Brook Water Service Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Rouse v. O'ConnellNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Suffolk Sanitary Corp. v. Town BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1975