Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Finn
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. The facts, which involve the validity of orders of the Kentucky Railroad Commission establishing rates and awarding reparation and the constitutionality of the statute under which the orders were made, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney
This case was here on a former occasion (Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Garrett, 231 U. S. 298), when an order denying a motion for an interlocutory injunction was affirmed. The suit was brought by the Railroad Company to enjoin the enforcement of two orders made August 10, 1910, by the Railroad Commission of Kentucky, onp of which prescribed maximum rates of freight upon certain intrastate traffic, and the other awarded specified amounts in reparation for payments previously exacted by the carrier for freight transportation in excess of the rates thus established by the Commission as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- New York Ex Rel. Hatch v. ReardonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- McGowan v. ParishSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- McSpadden v. Big Ben Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Jordan v. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.