Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Haralson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1937No. 6779PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge GERMAN

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

Defendants in error, J. C. Haralson and others, were plaintiffs in the trial court, and will be so designated here. Plaintiffs in error, Mrs. Bona Wheeler and husband, were defendants and will be designated as such here. Plaintiffs sued defendants to recover a 4/5 interest in certain lands in Mills County, Texas. Judgment of the district court was in favor of the defendants, but this judgment was reversed by the Court of Civil Appeals and the cause remanded. 70 S. W. (2d) 748.

We find it wholly unnecessary to set out…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCamey v. Hollister Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Hollister v. McCameyTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Robbins v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Young v. Kansas City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Davis v. Holloway and SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Michael v. BusbyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Gurley v. LindsleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Hursey v. HurseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. First Baptist Church of Ft. Worth v. Baptist Bible Sem.Texas Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Moseley v. FikesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API