Legal Opinion
Nova Health Systems v. Fogarty
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 20, 2005No. 02-5094PublishedCited by 236 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
We GRANT Appellee’s Petition for Panel Rehearing for the limited purpose of withdrawing the previous panel opinion and concurring/dissenting opinion and substituting a revised panel opinion and concurring/dissenting opinion. In all other regards, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED.
A judge of the court called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. A vote was taken, and a majority of the active judges of the court failed to vote for en banc rehearing.1 Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). Therefore, the suggestion for en banc rehearing is DENIED.
ABEL, Circuit Judge.
An Oklahoma statute…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by236 opinions
- Southern Walk at Broadlands Homeowner's Ass'n v. OpenBand at Broadlands, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Bronson v. SwensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. SchwartzwaldOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Jordan v. SosaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Commonwealth Property Advocates, LLC v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
231 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.