Legal Opinion

Woodward & Williamson's Assessment

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1922No. Appeals, Nos. 252 and 253PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This is an anomalous proceeding. It arises out of the assessment of coal lands belonging to appellees located in the Borough of Edwardsville and City of Wilkes-Barre, Luzerne County. While the nominal appellant is the County of Luzerne, the real appellants are the Borough of Edwardsville and the school district thereof. The complaint is against a decree of the court below reducing the assessments of appellees’ coal lands, and the proceeding we are called upon to review, results from a petition to open that decree upon which the court granted a rule to show…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schmuck v. HartmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Isett v. MaclaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Beringer v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Taylor v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  5. Hoar v. FlegalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fenerty Disbarment CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co. v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Kaylor v. AsheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Chester School District v. Richardson & Luce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Levine v. RothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API