Legal Opinion

Hoar v. Flegal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1881No. 165PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Clearfield County. Assumpsit by David J. Hoar & Co., against Lever Elegal. The cause came on for trial May 21st, 1879, and the jury rendered a verdict for the defendant.

Read the full summary

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Clearfield County. Assumpsit by David J. Hoar & Co., against Lever Elegal. The cause came on for trial May 21st, 1879, and the jury rendered a verdict for the defendant. The following day the plaintiffs made a motion in arrest of judgment and for a new trial, because, inter alia, “ John B. Mays, who served as a juror in the trial of this cause, was not drawn as a-juror for this term of court, and the said John B. Mays, a resident of Knox township, falsely personated and answered to the name of John Milton Mays, a citizen of Jordan township, who was drawn…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The record in this case is perfectly regular. That one of the panel of jurors was personated by a stranger was a matter only to be remedied on a motion for a new trial. It could not be reached by a motion in arrest of judgment, nor on error. The plaintiff in error is estopped by the record from alleging anything which contradicts it.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Woodward & Williamson's AssessmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API