Legal Opinion

Levine v. Roth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1923No. Appeal, No. 196PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Appellants specify two alleged errors: (1) an order, dated December 1, 1921, entering judgment for defendants under section 20 of the Act of May 14, 1915, P. L. 483; and (2) an order, dated May 19, 1922, discharging a rule to vacate the judgment and permit plaintiffs to amend their statement of claim.

Complaint is made that the judgment was entered on affidavits of defense in the nature of demurrers, without special notice to counsel for plaintiffs, and without allowing them an opportunity to amend. The section of the Practice Act, above referred to, provides that, when questions of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Opening of ParkwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Woodward & Williamson's AssessmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Levine v. Pittsburgh State BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co. v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. United Mercantile Agencies v. SlotskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Euster v. Standard Accident InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Hazle Township Supervisors' AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API