Legal Opinion

Ohio Farmers' Insurance Co. v. Todino

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1924No. 1805PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConn, J.

The facts in this case disclose that one Todino, husband of the plaintiff, on April 29, 1921, procured of the Ohio Farmers’ Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as defendant, a. fire and theft policy covering on an automobile; that on October 27, 1921, the husband visited the agent of the company and stated that he wanted the policy “corrected” by having it run in favor of his wife, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff; that pursuant to such direction the agent of the company made an indorsement, substituting the plaintiff instead of the husband as the insured.

Subsequently suit was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norris v. Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  2. Pollard v. Phœnix InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Conithan v. Royal InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Minnesota Lumber Co. v. Whitebreast Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  5. Mathews v. Wayne Junction Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Thomas v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
  2. Commercial Credit Co. v. SchreyerOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Automobile Finance Co. v. MundayOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Morris v. Firemen's InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. Wood v. Merchants InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API