Legal Opinion

Morris v. Firemen's Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1926No. 26,791PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action on a policy of insurance purporting to protect an automobile against theft. The main defense was that plaintiff had no insurable interest in the property.

The ostensible facts were these:

Plaintiff resided on a farm about four miles north of Burlington, county seat of Coffey county. In the autumn of 1923 he let it be known that he wished to buy a car. Several dealers from nearby towns called on him and exhibited their cars and quoted prices. A stranger also called on him, giving his name as that of W. K. Jones, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. North British & Mercantile Insurance v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  2. Ohio Farmers' Insurance Co. v. TodinoOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Hammond Motor Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Pope v. Glenn Falls InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  5. Miller v. Colonial Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Maryland Cas. Co. v. American Family Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Elder Chevrolet Co. v. Bailey County Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Golden Gate Motor Transport Co. v. Great American Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Roddy v. Hill Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Melton v. PrickettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API