Legal Opinion

Norris v. Alliance Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 5, 1923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff was the bona fide purchaser of an automobile- and defendant issued to him a policy of insurance ¿gainst theft. The policy contained a condition that it should be void "if the interest of the insured in the subject-matter of this insurance be other than unconditional and sole ownership.” The automobile was stolen from plaintiff, who brought suit on the policy and recovered, from which defendant has appealed on the ground that the trial court refused to direct a verdict for defendant, for the reason that plaintiff’s interest in the automobile was not an unconditional and sole…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Skaff v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  2. Grimm v. Prudence Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. Kutner Buick, Inc. v. StreleckiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  4. Ohio Farmers' Insurance Co. v. TodinoOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Phillips v. Cincinnati InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API