Legal Opinion

Commercial Credit Co. v. Schreyer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1929No. 21364 and 21530PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

The judgment in the court of common pleas and the affirmance of the judgment in the Court of Appeals in cause No. 21364 were rendered upon the theory that the failure to execute a bill of sale in favor of Seymour at the time of his purchase, and the consequent failure to file a bill of sale with the clerk of the court within three days thereafter, gave Seymour no title to the automobile, and therefore gave no validity to the chattel mortgage executed by him, and that the Central Ohio Peerless Compay was therefore free to give a bill of sale to Schreyer at a later date.

This case turns entirely…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
  2. United States v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  3. Harris v. RunnelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  4. Coosaw Mining Co. v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Dunlop v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commerce & Industry Insurance v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Cline v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Meeks v. PapadopulosOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Elder Chevrolet Co. v. Bailey County Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Automobile Finance Co. v. MundayOhio Supreme Court · 1940

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API