Legal Opinion
Purcell Mill & Elevator Co. v. Canadian Valley Const. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 10, 1916No. 7151PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error from District Court, McClain County; „ R. McMillan, Judge'. Action by the Canadian Valley Construction Company against the Purcell Mill & Elevator Company. The Oklahoma Central Railroad Company was substituted as plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.
The Canadian Valley Construction Company, a corporation, which will be hereinafter referred to as the “construction company,” commenced this action in the district court of McClain county, against the Purcell Mill & Elevator Company, a corporation, hereinafter. ref erred to as the “defendant,” to recover upon a certain bonus note executed and delivered to it by defendant on January 15, 1906, in words and figures 'as follows:.
“182 •. Purcell, I. T. Jany. 15, 1906.
“In consideration of the Canadian Valley Construction Company building, or pausing to be built from or near Le-high, Indian…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Guthrie & Western Railroad v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Cooper v. Ft. Smith & W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Cobb v. Wm. Kenefick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Southard v. Arkansas Valley & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Anderson v. Ferguson and ZaringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Citizens-First Nat. Bank v. WhitingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Shidler v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Powers v. HolderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Opinion No. 75-281 (1975) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1975