Legal Opinion
Texarkana & Fort Smith Railway Co. v. Hartford Insurance
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 31, 1897PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Appeal from Bowie. Tried below before H. C. Hynson, Esq., Special Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
TARLTON, Chief Justice.
No conclusions of fact and law were filed by his honor, who tried this ease without -the intervention of a jury, but the judgment imports the following conclusions of fact, which are supported by the evidence, and which we accordingly find:
On April 14, 1893, the Kizer Lumber Company, a partnership, owned a certain warehouse and certain personal property therein, of the value of $4386.16. The warehouse was situated fifteen feet north of appellant’s main track, on and along Front Street, in the city of- Texarkana, Texas. On that day the property was destroyed by fire, due…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- County of Harris v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Goldman v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Morrison v. FaulknerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Grimes County Taxpayers Ass'n v. Texas Municipal Power AgencyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- American National Fire Insurance Company v. Yellow Freight Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Shawnee Fire Insurance v. CosgroveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- F. H. Vahlsing, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Celaya v. City of BrownsvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.