Legal Opinion
F. H. Vahlsing, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided August 11, 1937No. 10109PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SLATTON, Justice.
Hartford Fire Insurance Company sued F. H. Vahising, Inc., in the Ninety-Second district court of Hidalgo county, seeking to recover $17,509.25, to which suit the T. & N. O. Railroad Company was made a party.
It was alleged that the insurance company insured the T. & N. O. Railroad Company against loss by fire, and that fifteen railroad cars were damaged by fire while in the possession of the railroad company on the 8th day of February, 1935. It was asserted that the entire loss amounted to $27,586.97, and under the contract of fire insurance the railroad company carried the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. Pullman Southern Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Perez v. RabaudTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Patitucci v. GerhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Fortis Benefits v. CantuTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Standard Accident Insurance v. PellecchiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- American Automobile Insurance v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- George M. Brewster & Son, Inc. v. Catalytic Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Duval County Ranch Co. v. Alamo Lumber Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.