Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Faulkner

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1891No. 3089PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion contains a statement.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

This action was instituted by appellee on a promissory note alleged to have been executed by appellants as partners on October 11, 1888, to secure the purchase money of a tract of land conveyed by him to them on which foreclosure of lien was sought.

Defendants by an answer, sworn to by one of them, alleged that the note was without consideration; that it was executed under duress caused by fear of a criminal prosecution threatened by Faulkner for an offense of which they were not guilty; that title to part of the land for which it was executed had failed, and defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. East Line & Red River Railway Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Guardian Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  2. Texarkana & Fort Smith Railway Co. v. Hartford InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. Sabinal State Bank v. EbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. S. H. Kress & Co. v. RustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API