Legal Opinion
Koch v. Bell, Lewis & Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided March 21, 2006No. COA04-1532PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUDSON, Judge.
In 1995, R & H Stucco & Wall Systems, subsequently known as Quality Stucco Systems Inc. (“Quality”) applied synthetic stucco cladding to the outside of plaintiffs’ new home. In 1996, after they discovered that the cladding was defective, plaintiffs made a claim against Quality. Quality had liability insurance through defendants Southern Guaranty Insurance Company (“Southern”) and Southern Pilot Insurance Company (“Southern Pilot”). Defendant Bell, Lewis & Associates (“Bell Lewis”) served as the adjusters for defendant insurers. After plaintiffs filed their claim, defendant…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Continental Insurance Co. v. Bayless & Roberts, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Bass v. California Life Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- Sanchez v. Lindsey Morden Claims Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Charleston Dry Cleaners & Laundry, Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Draughon v. Harnett County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robert Lodholtz v. York Risk Services Group, IncoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Hardin v. KCS International, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Sauers v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Akpan v. Farmers Ins. Exchange, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Cedarbrook Residential Ctr., Inc. v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.