Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. Lindsey Morden Claims Services, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1999No. B123946PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEAL, J.

Summary

An independent adjuster engaged by an insurer owes no duty of care to the claimant insured, with whom the adjuster has no contract. The adjuster is not liable in tort to the insured for alleged negligent claims handling which causes only economic loss.

Facts and Proceedings in Trial Court

The relevant facts, which appear from appellant Luis Sanchez’s first amended complaint, and from a status conference memorandum judicially noticed in the trial court, are as follows: Sanchez was engaged in business, transporting commercial machinery, under the fictitious business name LA…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Paulsen v. CNF INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Robert Lodholtz v. York Risk Services Group, IncoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  3. Glenn K. Jackson Inc., Dba Jackson & Donahue Glenn K. Jackson v. Richard Roe Stuart, Maue, Mitchell & JamesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Mintz v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH v. BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE SERVICES, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API