Legal Opinion

Six v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 2008No. S-07-0199PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[T1] Appellant, Brent Lee Six (Six), appeals from the district court's judgment and sentence which found him guilty of escape. Six contends that the State erred in failing to afford him an initial appearance within 72 hours of his arrest, as required by W.R.Cr.P. 5(a), and that cireumstance requires dismissal of the charges against him. In addition, he contends that the district court erred in instructing the jury as to the intent element of the crime of escape, and that error requires reversal of his conviction. We will affirm.

ISSUES

[12] Six states these issues:

I. Did the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Crozier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Ogden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Dorador v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Metzger v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Mueller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Rolle v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Baker v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Kramer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Joseph R. Walker v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API