Rolle v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Justice.
[¶ 1] Donald Lee Rolle (the appellant) seeks to overturn his convictions for first-degree murder, felony murder, and kidnapping. He asserts numerous claims of error. Finding no abuse of discretion or prejudicial error, we affirm.
ISSUES
[If 2] 1. Did the district court abuse its discretion when it admitted certain uncharged misconduct evidence?
2. Did the district court commit plain error when it did not give a limiting instruction immediately after the introduction of the uncharged misconduct evidence, but rather waited until the close of evidence, when defense counsel requested…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- United States v. Marmon Dennis RecordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Mersereau v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- John Wallace McGinn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Gregory M. Toth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Garrison v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Boucher v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.