Legal Opinion

Kramer v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2012No. S-11-0043PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[¶1] Timothy David Kramer was conviet-ed of attempted first-degree murder and complains on appeal that the jury was improperly instructed, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, and that a witness improperly testified by video conference. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] Kramer lists three issues for our consideration:

1. The jury was not properly instructed on the elements of first-degree murder as the instructions did not state the jury had to find unanimously that Kramer did not act in the defense of others and the verdict form did not give the jury a venue to make this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Gleason v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State of West Virginia v. Daniel L. HerbertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Robert Olaf Anderson v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Lewis Alan Dugan v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Christopher David Tarpey v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Carter v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API