Legal Opinion

Miller v. Belk

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 25, 1973No. 7326SC44PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant’s first principal contention on appeal is that the complaint does not state a claim upon which relief can be granted and that this is necessary to support a default judgment. In determining the sufficiency of a complaint, we are guided by Justice Sharp’s discussion on the subject in Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94, 176 S.E. 2d 161 (1970), as follows:

Under the “notice theory of pleading” a statement of claim is adequate if it gives sufficient notice of the claim asserted “to enable the adverse party to answer and prepare for trial, to allow for the application of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. American Dairy Queen Corporation v. AugustynDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Triangle Porsche-Audi, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Cordell v. JarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Highfill v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Robert Yale, Ancillary Administrator of the Estate of Joseph Dudley Schofield, Deceased v. National Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  5. G & M Sales of Eastern North Carolina, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API