Legal Opinion
Hanlin v. Sternlicht
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 27, 2004PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Friedman, J.), entered June 26, 2003, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Liberally construed, the complaint alleges that plaintiff’s contract as a bridge instructor with the 92nd Street YMHA/ YWHA (the Y) was not renewed because defendant, hired by the Y as a summer substitute for plaintiff, slandered plaintiff by telling the Y that plaintiff is “incompetent” and that students had told him that “they had not even learned [from plaintiff] the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Liberman v. GelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Herlihy v. Metropolitan Museum of ArtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Sborgi v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pezhman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Gondal v. New York City Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Constantine v. Teachers CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Weitz v. BrudermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Sagaille v. CarregaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.