Legal Opinion

Weitz v. Bruderman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 6, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.), entered May 24, 2004, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendants appropriately assert the common interest privilege (see Liberman v Gelstein, 80 NY2d 429, 437 [1992]), and plaintiff has failed to raise a question of fact as to malice such as might overcome the privilege. Plaintiff has not adduced proof warranting an inference “that [defendants] acted out of personal spite or ill will, with reckless disregard for the statements’ truth or falsity, or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Liberman v. GelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Foster v. ChurchillNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Sweeney v. Prisoners' Legal Services of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Hanlin v. SternlichtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sagaille v. CarregaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. Sagaille v. CarregaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. Hammond v. Equinox Holdings LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API