Legal Opinion
Gondal v. New York City Department of Education
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 7, 2005PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Faviola A. Soto, J.), entered October 6, 2004, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
According to the complaint, injurious statements were made about plaintiff’s performance as a teacher by the principal of the New York City public school in which he worked. Elaintiff s claims, however, insofar as they purport to seek damages for defamation, are time-barred, since plaintiff failed to file a notice of claim within the applicable three-month statutory period (see *142Education Law §…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hanlin v. SternlichtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Aguinaga v. 342 East 72nd Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Yong Ki Hong v. KBS America, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Bayer v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Mitchell v. New York Univ. ("NYU")Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Friedman v. RiceNew York Supreme Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.