Legal Opinion

Walker v. State, Dept. of Corrections

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 2018No. 7237 S-16202PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOLGER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Alaska Department of Corrections (DOC) found an inmate guilty of making a false statement to a staff member about work he was supposed to be doing and ordered the inmate to pay in restitution half the amount of his wages for that work. The inmate appeals, arguing that DOC violated his due process rights by refusing to allow him to call witnesses at his disciplinary hearing. We conclude that Walker did not waive his due process claim by failing to raise it during the administrative appeal process. We also recognize that prisoners have a constitutional right…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jeffrey West and Bonnie West v. The Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority; State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Trust Land Office; Louis Oliva; and Stacy OlivaAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Simmons v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Huber v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Billy Dean Smith and Jacob Lee Anagick v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. David Nordlund v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API