Huber v. State, Dept. of Corrections
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOLGER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Federal law requires that a prison disciplinary decision must include a written statement of the evidence relied on and the reasons for the decision. In this case, the superior court affirmed a decision finding a prisoner "guilty" without any further explanation. The court reasoned that the prisoner was not prejudiced because the disciplinary hearing was recorded, and the prisoner was able to adequately explain his version of the evidence in his appeal. But we conclude that the written disciplinary decision or the audio recording must ordinarily include a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Llewellyn Culbert v. Warren YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Jerry Saenz v. Warren YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- McGinnis v. StevensAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- David Nordlund v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
- Mate Valoaga v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2025