Legal Opinion
Franklin Auto Body Co. v. Wicker
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 27, 1987No. C8-87-903PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
A. PAUL LOMMEN, Judge.
Robert Wicker appeals the dismissal of his claims on summary judgment. The trial court found the claims barred by the statute of limitations and the statute of frauds. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Robert Wicker brought two actions in July, 1985; one in district court for breach of contract, and one in county court for conversion. Respondent Franklin Wicker moved for consolidation, summary judgment, and costs. The motions were heard on March 26, 1987, and granted on April 8, 1987. Robert Wicker appeals the dismissal of his actions, but does not challenge the other…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holmes v. TorgusonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Northway v. WhitingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Rudnitski v. SeelyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Gary S. Holmes v. Marlin F. Torguson, Mardi Gras Casino Corp., Delta Casino Corp., Delta Casino Corp., Counterclaim Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. Gary S. Holmes, Commercial State Bank of Minnesota, Counterclaim Defendants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994