Fletcher v. Hanington Bros., Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Justice.
This appeal raises the issue whether optional deductions from an employee’s pay for the purchase of health insurance must be included in the calculation of the employee’s “average weekly wage” pursuant to 39 M.R.S.A. § 2(2) (1989), repealed and replaced by P.L.1991, ch. 885, § A-7 (effective January 1, 1993), codified as 39-A M.R.S.A. § 102(4) (Supp.1993). Because we conclude that the employee’s average weekly wage does include such deductions, we vacate the decisions of the Appellate Division and the Commission.
Fletcher began work for the employer, Hanington Brothers, in 1990…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Nielsen v. Burnham & Morrill, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Construction Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Ashby v. Rust Engineering Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- St. Pierre v. St. Regis Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ciampi v. Hannaford Bros. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Hincks v. Robert Mitchell Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Clukey v. Piscataquis County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Brodeur v. NMC HomecareSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Teska, R. v. EQT Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.