Interconnect Telephone Services, Inc. v. Farren (In Re Interconnect Telephone Services, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO DISMISS CLAIMS
BURTON R. LIFLAND, Bankruptcy Judge.
Interconnect Telephone Services (“Interconnect”), the debtor herein, is in the business of selling, installing and servicing telephone equipment. It commenced this adversary proceeding against four of its former employees, William Farren, John Williams, Robert Willenberg, and Dominick Mannina, and Telesis Communications Corporation (“Telesis”) alleging inter alia that these employees breached their fiduciary duties to Interconnect by forming a competing corporation, Telesis,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,697 John P. Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,590 David Segal v. Lawrence Gordon, and Coburn Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flexi-Van Leasing, Inc. v. Perez (In Re Perez)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Lanmark Group, Inc. v. Rifkin (In Re Rifkin)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Sculler v. Rosen (In Re Rosen)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- Sculler v. Rosen (In Re Rosen)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Flexi-Van Leasing, Inc. v. Perez (In Re Perez)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1993